Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Habitat Evaluation in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, Delhi Using Multi-Criteria Analysis

Authors

  • S P S Kushwaha Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, 248001, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7123-4013
  • Subrata Nandy Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, 248001, India https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-4035
  • Sonam Tomar Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Indian Space Research Organisation, Dehradun, 248001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.3179

Keywords:

Antelope, Habitat suitability, Geospatial technology, Analytical hierarchy process, Conservation, Management, Aravali

Abstract

This study aims to assess Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus Pallas) habitat in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary (WLS), Delhi, using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA). Nilgai is endemic to the Peninsular Indian and Indus divisions of the Indian sub-region in the Asian Indo-Malayan Region. It is a species of least conservation concern in its native range. The study was carried out in the Asola-Bhatti WLS, Delhi, located in the south-eastern part of the southern ridge, the south-east boundary spreading up to the Delhi-Haryana border. The Sanctuary covers an area of about 32.71 km2. The vegetation is described as semi-arid thorny scrub, while it is designated as Northern Tropical Desert Thorn Forest (6BC1) and scrub as Ziziphus scrub (6BDS1). Nilgai habitat suitability in the study area was evaluated using MCA and a linear additive model using Cartosat-1, IRS P6 LISS-IV, and GoogleEarth data. MCA of Nilgai habitat was done using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) through empirical judgement of preferences and an acceptable result was obtained, i.e., 0.019, less than 0.1 which is considered as a standard consistency ratio. A model was processed on the reclassified thematic layers by assigning them weightage according to the preferred habitat of nilgai. Thus, 53% (17.28 km2) area of the entire Sanctuary was demonstrated as highly suitable followed by 27% (8.98 km2) as suitable, 8% (2.50 km2) as moderately suitable, and 12% (3.95 km2) as least suitable area for nilgai. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that all the predictor variables derived from satellite imagery demonstrated the usefulness of geospatial technology for habitat modelling.

References

Adams, A.L. 1858. Remarks on the habits and haunts of some of the Mammalia found in various parts of India and the western Himalayan Mountains. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 26, 512-531.

Alfred, J.R.B., Kankane, P.L., Kumar, A., Roy, P.S., Singh, S., and Verma, M. 2001. Habitat suitability analysis for chinkara, Gazella bennetti in Rajasthan: A remote sensing and GIS approach. Zoological Survey of India Occasional Paper, 189, 1-73.

Blanford, W.T. 1888. The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma: Mammalia. Taylor and Francis, London.

Brown, M., Lewis, H.G. and Gunn, S.R. 2000. Linear spectral mixture models and support vector machines for remote sensing. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 38, 2346-2360. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.868891

Champion, H.G. and Seth, S.K. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Government of India Publications, New Delhi.

Corbet, G.B. and Hill, J.E. 1992. The Mammals of the Indo-Malayan region: A Systematic Review. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Dhami, B., Bhusal, A., Adhikari, B., Miya, M. S., Maharjan, S. K., Neupane, D. and Adhikari, H. 2023. Habitat suitability and conflict zone mapping for the blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) across Nepal. Animals, 13(5), 937. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13050937

Dinerstein, E. 1979. An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali-Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Part II. Habitat/animal interactions. Biological Conservation, 18, 265-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(79)90055-7

Dinerstein, E. 1980. An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali-Bardia Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Part III. Ungulate populations. Biological Conservation, 18, 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(80)90063-4

Ellerman, J.R. and Morrison-Scott, T.C.S. 1966. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian mammals 1758 to 1956 (2nd ed.). Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London.

Habib, B., Dar, A.T., Khan, A.J. and Kushwaha, S.P.S. 2010. Evaluation of habitat suitability models for four sympatric ungulate species in Pathri Rao watershed adopting geo-statistical modelling. Current Science, 99(4), 500-506.

Imam, E. and Tesfamichael, G.Y. 2013. Use of remote sensing, GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in wildlife habitat suitability analysis. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 4(3), 460-467.

IUCN 2006. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species. www. iucnredlist.org.

Khan, J.A. 1994. Food habits of ungulates in dry tropical forests of Gir Lion Sanctuary, Gujarat, India. Acta Theorilogica, 39, 185-193.

Kumar, V., Raghevendra, S., Devagiri, G.M. and Rani, V. 2023. Mapping Asian elephant habitat suitability index in Alur taluk, central Western Ghats: A GIS, remote sensing, and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach for conservation assessment. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 2052-2062. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2023/v13i102866

Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Roy, P.S. 2002. Geospatial technology for wildlife habitat evaluation. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 137-150.

Kushwaha, S.P.S., Khan, A., Habib, B., Quadri, A. and Singh, A. 2004. Evaluation of sambar and muntjak habitats using geostatistical modeling. Current Science, 86(10), 1390-1400.

Kushwaha, S.P.S., Nandy, S. and Gupta, M. 2014. Growing stock and woody biomass assessment in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, Delhi, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(9), 5911-5920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3828-0

Kushwaha, S.P.S., Roy, P.S., Azeem, A., Boruah, P. and Lahan, P. 2000. Land area change and rhino habitat suitability analysis in Kaziranga National Park, Assam. Tiger Paper, 28 (27), 9-17.

Lamprey, H.F. 1963. Ecological separation of large mammal species in the Tarangire Game Reserve, Tanganyika. East African Wildlife Journal, 5, 151-166.

Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W. and Chipman, J. 2015. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

Maheswari, J.K. 1963. The Flora of Delhi, CSIR, New Delhi.

Mallon, D.P. 2003. Boselaphus tragocamelus. IUCN 2006 Red List of Threatened Species. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 4 April, 2016.

Mirza, Z.B. and Khan, M.A. 1975. Study of distribution, habitat and food of nilgai, Boselaphus tragocamelus in Punjab. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 7, 209-214.

Nandy, S., Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Gaur, P. 2012. Identification of Swamp deer (Cervus duvauceli duvauceli Cuvier) potential habitat in Jhilmil Jheel Conservation Reserve, Uttarakhand, India using multi-criteria analysis. Environmental Management, 49(4), 902-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9826-5

Nandy, S., Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Mukhopadhyay, S. 2007. Monitoring the Chilla-Motichur wildlife corridor using geospatial tools. Journal for Nature Conservation, 15(4), 237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2007.03.003

Nandy, S., Kushwaha, S.P.S. and Srinet, R. 2019. Wildlife habitat evaluation in mountainous landscapes. pp. 341-352. In: Navalgund, R.R., Senthil Kumar, A. and Nandy, S. (Eds.) Remote Sensing of Northwest Himalayan Ecosystems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2128-3_16

Nandy, S., Neethu Lakshmi, M. and Kushwaha, S.P.S. 2020. Habitat suitability analysis of Himalayan musk deer (Moschus leucogaster) in part of Western Himalaya, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 48(11), 1523-1533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01175-8

Panwar, H.S. 1991. Status of management of protected areas in India: problems and prospects. Tiger Paper, 18(3), 17-25.

Porwal, M.C., Roy, P.S. and Chellamuthu, V. 1996. Wildlife habitat analysis for sambar (Cervus unicolor) in Kanha National Park using remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17, 2683-2697. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169608949100

Prajapati, M.C. and Singh, S. 1994. A beneficial aspect of nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in scientifically utilized ravines- an observation. Indian Forester, 120, 890-897.

Prater, S.H. 1980. The Book of Indian Animals. Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai.

Rahmani, A.R. 2001. India. Pp. 178-187. In: Mallon, D.P. and Kingswood, S.C. (Eds.) Antelopes. Part 4: North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland..

Roy, P.S., Ravan, S.A., Rajadnya, N., Das, K.K., Jain, A. and Singh, S. 1995. Habitat suitability analysis of Nemorhaedus goral- a remote sensing and geographic information system approach. Current Science, 69, 685-691.

Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sankar, K. and Vijayan,V.S. 1992. Notes on the food habits of nilgai Boselaphus tragocamelus. Journal Bombay Natural History Society, 89, 115-116.

Sati. J.P and Khanna, V. 2003. Some Selected Fauna of Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary (Delhi). Conservation Area, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, 16, 1-70.

Sawarkar, V.B. and Hussain, S.A. 1997. Problems and prospects in conserving Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary - some management strategies. ZSI. State Fauna Series, 6, 853-866.

Schamberger, M. and Krohn, W.B. 1982. Status of the habitat evaluation procedures. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources, 47, 154-164.

Sharma, I.K. 1981. Ecological aspects of habitat preferences, feeding, daily activities and niche of the nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus). Tiger Paper, 8, 21-22.

Shukla, R. and Khare, P.K. 1998. Food habits of wild ungulates and their competition with livestock in Pench Wildlife Reserve, central India. Journal Bombay Natural History Society, 95, 418–421.

Singh. A. and Kushwaha, S.P.S. 2011. Refining logistic regression models for wildlife habitat suitability modeling- a case study with muntjak and goral in the Central Himalayas, India. Ecological Modelling, 222(8), 1354-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.012

Solanki, G.S. and Naik, R.M. 1998. Grazing interactions between wild and domestic herbivores. Small Ruminant Research, 27, 231-235.

Williamson, C.R., Campa III, H., Locher, A.B., Winterstein, S.R. and Beyer, D.E. 2021. Applications of integrating wildlife habitat suitability and habitat potential models. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 45(1), 70-84.

Zarri, A.A., Rahmani, A.R., Singh, A. and Kushwaha, S.P.S. 2008. Habitat suitability assessment for the endangered Nilgiri laughingthrush: a multiple logistic regression approach. Current Science, 94(11), 1487-1494.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-04

How to Cite

Kushwaha, S. P. S., Nandy, S., & Tomar, S. (2024). Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) Habitat Evaluation in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, Delhi Using Multi-Criteria Analysis. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 50(2), 272–283. https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.3179