Responses of Pine and Oak Species to Drought: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2025.0680

Keywords:

Hydraulic safety margin, Isohydric and anisohydric behaviour, Pinus halepensis, Pinus sylvestris, Quercus ilex, Water potenetial

Abstract

Pines (Pinus, with approximately 113 species) and oaks (Quercus, with around 435 species) are key genera that form forests across the entire Northern Hemisphere. These regions are often associated with seasonal drought and forest fires, worsening conditions due to climate change. In this study, we used bibliometric techniques to analyse research patterns regarding the drought responses of pine and oak species from 1977 to 2024. Our analysis relied on the Web of Science (WoS) database, focusing on publications indexed in both the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index. Our review included 104 studies examining 29 pine and 42 oak species in 58 combinations. Notably, many pine and oak species have yet to be studied. The most researched species include P. sylvestris (27 studies), P. halepensis (25 studies), and Q. ilex (27 studies). Geographically, the Mediterranean basins were found to be the most prominent areas of study. Much of the research originated in the United States and France, while recent contributions have come from China, Spain, and Canada. Research publications on this topic have increased since the 1990s, with noticeable peaks in 2008, 2011, and 2023. The journals contributing significantly to this body of knowledge include Tree Physiology, Forest Ecology and Management, and the Journal of Experimental Botany. Interestingly, while drought is a crucial aspect of plant ecology, much research has focused on physiological and botanical considerations. In the past two decades, there has been a marked increase in integrating climate-related variables with traditional physiological components and water management. The bibliometric analysis concluded that, at the genus level, the primary strategy of pines in response to drought stress is predominantly isohydric, while oaks tend to be anisohydric. This difference allows oaks to maintain gas exchange and carbon fixation, even for increased water loss. The shared occurrence of pine and oak species throughout the Northern Hemisphere suggests that proper management practices can be developed to promote the growth of one species through the other, especially by learning from post-drought recovery processes and succession.

References

Blanch, J.S., Peñuelas, J. and Llusià, J. 2007. Sensitivity of terpene emissions to drought and fertilization in terpene storing Pinus halepensis and non storing Quercus ilex. Physiologia Plantarum, 131(2), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00944.x

Chirino, E., Bellot, J. and Sánchez, J.R. 2011. Daily sap flow rate as an indicator of drought avoidance mechanisms in five Mediterranean perennial species in semi-arid southeastern Spain. Trees, 25, 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0536-4

Denk, T., Grimm, G.W., Manos, P.S., Deng, M. and Hipp, A.L. 2017. An updated infrageneric classification of the oaks: Review of previous taxonomic schemes and synthesis of evolutionary patterns. pp. 13-38. In: Gil-Pelegrín, E., Peguero-Pina, J. and Sancho-Knapik, D. (Eds.), Oaks Physiological Ecology. Exploring the Functional Diversity of Genus Quercus L. Tree Physiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69099-5_2

Farjon, A. and Filer, D. 2013. An Atlas of the World’s Conifers: An analysis of their distribution, biogeography, diversity and conservation status. Brill, Berlin. 512 pages. https://brill.com/display/title/20587

Gernandt, D.S., López, G.G., García, S.O. and Liston, A. 2005. Phylogeny and classification of Pinus. Taxon, 54(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065300

Kannenberg, S.A., Novick, K.A. and Phillips, R.P. 2019. Anisohydric behavior linked to persistent hydraulic damage and delayed drought recovery across seven North American tree species. New Phytologist, 222(4), 1862-1872. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15699

Kreuzwieser, J., Meischner, M., Grün, M., Yáñez-Serrano, A.M., Fasbender, L. and Werner, C. 2021. Drought affects carbon partitioning into volatile organic compound biosynthesis in Scots pine needles. New Phytologist, 232(5), 1930-1943. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17736

Li, T., Cui, L., Scotton, M., Dong, J., Xu, Z., Che, R., Tang, L., Cai, S., Wu, W., Andreatta, D. and Wang, Y. 2022. Characteristics and trends of grassland degradation research. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 22(7), 1901-1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03209-9

Li, T., Cui, L., Wu, Y., Pandey, R., Liu, H., Dong, J., Wang, W., Xu, Z., Song, X., Hao, Y. and Cui, X. 2025. Unveiling and advancing grassland degradation research using a BERTopic modelling approach. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 24(3), 949-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.11.008

Li, T., Singh, R.K., Cui, L., Pandey, R., Liu, H., Xu, Z., Tang, L., Du, J., Cui, X. and Wang, Y. 2024. Beyond grassland degradation: Pathways to resilience for pastoralist households in alpine grassland ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Management, 368, 121992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121992

Loudermilk, E.L., Hiers, J.K., Pokswinski, S., O’Brien, J.J., Barnett, A. and Mitchell, R.J. 2016. The path back: Oaks (Quercus spp.) facilitate longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) seedling establishment in xeric sites. Ecosphere, 7(6), e01361. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1361

Poulos, H.M. 2014. Tree mortality from a short-duration freezing event and global-change-type drought in a Southwestern piñon-juniper woodland, USA. PeerJ, 2, e404. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.404

Sanz-Perez, V., Castro-Diez, P. and Joffre, R. 2009. Seasonal carbon storage and growth in Mediterranean tree seedlings under different water conditions. Tree Physiology, 29, 1105-1116. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp045

Schuldt, B., Buras, A., Arend, M., Vitasse, Y., Beierkuhnlein, C., Damm, A., Gharun, M., Grams, T.E.E., Hauck, M., Hajek, P., Hartmann, H., Hiltbrunner, E., Hoch, G., Holloway-Phillips, M., Korner, C., Larysch, E., Lubbe, T., Nelson, D.B., Rammig, A., Rigling, A., Rose, L., Ruehr, N.K., Schumann, K., Weiser, F., Werner, C., Wohlgemuth, T., Zang, C.S. and Kahmen, A. 2020. A first assessment of the impact of the extreme 2018 summer drought on Central European forests. Basic and Applied Ecology, 45, 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2020.04.003

Sheffer, E. 2012. A review of the development of Mediterranean pine–oak ecosystems after land abandonment and afforestation: Are they novel ecosystems? Annals of Forest Science, 69, 429-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0181-0

Singh, J.S. and Singh, S.P. 1992. Forests of Himalaya. Structure, Functioning and Impact of Man. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India.

Yi, K., Smith, J.W., Jablonski, A.D., Tatham, E.A., Scanlon, T.M., Lerdau, M.T., Novick, K.A. and Yang, X. 2020. High heterogeneity in canopy temperature among co-occurring tree species in a temperate forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 125(12), e2020JG005892. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005892

Downloads

Published

2025-05-21

How to Cite

Li, T., Singh, S. P., Singh, R. D., Cui, L., & Pandey, R. (2025). Responses of Pine and Oak Species to Drought: A Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 51(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2025.0680