Bird Diversity on an Under-Constructed Educational Campus: A Case Study of Nalanda University, Rajgir, India

Authors

  • Harsh Yadav Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 240-8501, Japan
  • Shashank Pansari School of Ecology and Environment Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, 803116, India
  • Shyam S. Phartyal School of Ecology and Environment Studies, Nalanda University, Rajgir, 803116, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0334

Keywords:

Avifauna, Academic campus, Bird diversity, Bird counting, Citizen Science

Abstract

Bird species have been critically impacted by increasing anthropogenic activities such as infrastructural construction. Academic institutions with dedicated semi-natural landscapes may provide shelter to high bird diversity. However, assessing the bird diversity of an under-construction campus becomes critical for future comparison. This study was conducted at Nalanda University Campus, India, for five months, as the campus was at the fag-end of the construction phase with diverse land use changes. 91 bird species were found on campus primarily dominated by insectivores and omnivores. Occurrence, and migratory status of the species revealed that 47% were resident, primarily occupying aquatic habitats. Despite presence of Least Concern IUCN status bird species in the campus, substantial number of them had a declining abundance index at the national level. Sites with high land conversion showed a low number of bird species. The overall dominance and evenness highlighted a good bird diversity, contrary to altered sites where both these attributes were high. Data for the documented bird species on citizen science platforms highlighted limited information on species interactions. This study attempted to bring attention to the unchecked impact of construction activities on bird diversity and regular monitoring in the widely discussed emerging semi-natural shelters, i.e., academic campuses.

References

Anderle, M., Brambilla, M., Hilpold, A., Matabishi, J.G., Paniccia, C., Rocchini, D., Rossin, J., Tasser, E., Torresani, M., Tappeiner, U. and Seeber, J. 2023. Habitat heterogeneity promotes bird diversity in agricultural landscapes: Insights from remote sensing data. Basic and Applied Ecology, 7, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2023.04.006

Anonymous. 2023a. State of India’s Birds: Range, trends and conservation status. The SoIB Partnership, 119 pages.

Anonymous. 2023b. iNaturalist. Accessed 15 March 2024. https://www.inaturalist.org

Anonymous. 2023c. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-1. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Accessed 15th March 2024. https://www.iucnredlist.org

Anonymous 2023d. xeno-canto-sharing wildlife sounds from around the world. Accessed 20 January 2023. https://xeno-canto.org/

Anonymous. 2024a. Flourish studio. Accessed 23 March 2024. https://flourish.studio/.

Anonymous. 2024b. Macaulay Library. Cornell Lab. Accessed 15th March 2024. https://www.macaulaylibrary.org/

Anonymous 2024c. Net-Zero Green Sustainable Campus. Nalanda University. Accessed 12 March 2024. https://nalandauniv.edu.in/net-zero-campus/

Anonymous 2024d. Birdlife International-Data Zone. Accessed 15 March 2024. https://datazone.birdlife.org/home

Bregman, T.P., Lees, A.C., Seddon, N., MacGregor, H.E., Darski, B., Aleixo, A., Bonsall, M.B. and Tobias, J.A. 2015. Species interactions regulate the collapse of biodiversity and ecosystem function in tropical forest fragments. Ecology, 96(10), 2692-2704. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1731.1

Callaghan, C.T., Nakagawa, S. and Cornwell, W.K. 2021. Global abundance estimates for 9,700 bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(21), e2023170118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023170118

Conway, J.R., Lex, A. and Gehlenborg, N. 2017. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics, 33(18), 2938-2940. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364

Devi, O.S., Islam, M., Das, J. and Saikia, P.K. 2012. Avian-fauna of Gauhati University Campus, Jalukbari, Assam. The Ecoscan, 6(3&4), 165-170.

Diaz, A., Reynoso, A., Pellón, J.J., Camarena, N., Tataje, D., Quispe-Torres, A., Montenegro, J. and Hein, L. 2024. Diet and bird-plant interaction networks based on CS data in Lima, Peru: exotic and native species are important. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2024.2322307

Fleri, J.R., Wessel, S.A., Atkins, D.H., Case, N.W., Albeke, S.E. and Laughlin, D. 2021. Global Vegetation Project: An Interactive Online Map of Open-Access Vegetation Photos. Vegetation Classification and Survey, 2, 41-45. https://doi.org/10.3897/VCS/2021/60575

Frerebeau, N. 2023. Tabula: Analysis and Visualization of Archaeological Count Data. Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Pessac, France, doi:10.5281/zenodo.1489944. R package version 3.0.1, https://packages.tesselle.org/tabula/.

Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C. and Inskipp, T. 2011. Pocket Guides to the Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, Mumbai.

Guthula, V.B., Shrotriya, S., Nigam, P., Goyal, S.P., Mohan, D. and Habib, B. 2022. Biodiversity significance of small habitat patches: More than half of Indian bird species are in academic campuses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022. 104552

Hedblom, M. and Murgui, E. 2017. Urban Bird Research in a Global Perspective. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M, editors. Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_1

Iwachido, Y., Uchida, K. and Sasaki, T. 2023. Artificial developed habitats can sustain plant communities similar to remnant ecosystems in the Tokyo megacity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 83, 127899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127899

Jim, C.Y. and Chen, S.S. 2003. Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing city, China. Landscape and urban planning, 65(3), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02) 00244-X

Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A. and Simmons, B. 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(10), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436

Kumar, N. and Prabhat, V. 2013. Ghoda-Katora Lake, Rajgir (Nalanda), an Ideal Bird Sanctuary - A Review. India Water Portal. (in Hindi) https://hindi.indiawaterportal.org/articles/ghaodaa-kataoraa-jhaila-raajagaira-naalanadaa-adarasa-pakasai-vaihaara-eka-vaivaecanaa.

Kumari, B., Kumari, P., Kumari, K. and Kumari, A. 2021. Biomonitoring of bird’s species diversity of a college campus to assess the healthy ecosystem. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 12(06), 42092-42096.

Liu, J., Yu, M., Tomlinson, K. and Slik, J.F. 2017. Patterns and drivers of plant biodiversity in Chinese university campuses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.04.008.

Manjula, M., Kumar, R. and Kumar, R. 2022. Birds in and around the Gidhhi and Pushpakarni Lake: An ideal bird watching site in Nalanda. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 10(5), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.22271/j.ento.2022.v10.i5b.9048

Mayorga, I., Bichier P. and Philpott, S.M. 2020. Local and landscape drivers of bird abundance, species richness, and trait composition in urban agroecosystems. Urban ecosystems, 23(3), 495-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00934-2.

McIntyre, N.E., Rango, J., Fagan, W.F. and Faeth, S.H. 2001. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landscape and urban planning, 52(4), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00122-5.

Mehta, J. and Sharma, G. 2022. Avian diversity importance in the climate of Nalanda Bihar. Preprint at Research Square, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1886415/v1.

Mekonen, S. 2017. Birds as biodiversity and environmental indicator. Advances in Life Science and Technology 60, 16-22. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/ALST/article/view/39057/45460

Oertli, B., Decrey, M., Demierre, E., Fahy, J.C., Gallinelli, P., Vasco, F. and Ilg, C. 2023. Ornamental ponds as Nature-based Solutions to implement in cities. Science of the Total Environment, 888, 164300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164300.

Pereira, H.M., Navarro, L.M. and Martins, I.S. 2012. Global biodiversity change: the bad, the good, and the unknown. Annual review of environment and resources, 37, 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042911-093511

Keesey, T.M. 2024. Phylopic: free silhouette images of organisms (version 2.0). Accessed: 26 March 2024. https://www.phylopic.org/

Rajendran, A., Aravindhan, V. and Sarvalingam, A. 2014. Biodiversity of the Bharathiar university campus, India: A floristic approach. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(4), 308-319.

Ralph, C.J, Sauer, J.R. and Droege, S. 1995. Monitoring bird populations by point counts. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-149. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA. 187 pages.

Rondinini, C., Di Marco, M., Visconti, P., Butchart, S.H. and Boitani, L. 2014. Update or outdate: Longterm viability of the IUCN Red List. Conservation Letters, 7(2), 126-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12040

Rosenzweig, M.L. 2003. Win-win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195156041.001.0001

Urfi, A.J., Sen, M., Kalam, A. and Meganathan, T. 2005. Counting birds in India: Methodologies and trends. Current Science, 89(12), 1997-2003. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24111060

Warren, P.S. and Lepczyk, C.A. 2012. Beyond the gradient: Insights from new work in the avian ecology of urbanizing lands. Pp. 1-6. In: Lepczyk, C.A. and Warren, P.S. (Eds.) Urban Bird Ecology and Conservation. University of California Press, Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520273092.003.0001

Wintle, B.A., Kujala, H., Whitehead, A., Cameron, A., Veloz, S., Kukkala, A., Moilanen, A., Gordon, A., Lentini, P.E., Cadenhead, N.C.R. and Bekessy, S.A. 2019. Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,116(3), 909-914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813051115.

Zhang, W., Liang, C., Liu, J., Si, X. and Feng, G. 2018. Species richness, phylogenetic and functional structure of bird communities in Chinese university campuses are associated with divergent variables. Urban Ecosystems, 21, 1213-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0803-5

Downloads

Published

2024-08-06

How to Cite

Yadav, H., Pansari, S., & Phartyal, S. S. (2024). Bird Diversity on an Under-Constructed Educational Campus: A Case Study of Nalanda University, Rajgir, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 50(6), 909–920. https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0334