Quantification of Ecosystem Services of the Melghat Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0330Keywords:
Carbon sequestration, Ecosystem services, Ecotourism, Forest right act, Forest valuation, Growing stock, Non-timber forest products, Recreation benefitsAbstract
The present study was an attempt to quantify the direct as well as indirect ecosystem services from forest ecosystems in the Melghat area, which were undervalued in economic terms as compared to other developmental projects. The valuation of growing stock in the Melghat Tiger Reserve (MTR) was estimated to be IRs 80221 crores (equal to 9600 million US $). While the carbon sequestration potential of the system was estimated to be IRs 9291 crores, the value of non-timber forest products (NTFP), a part of the provisioning service, was IRs 3.92 crore. The Forest land itself is valued at IRs 66874 crores using the current land costs in the region for non-forest uses. Recreation benefits are estimated to be IRs 30.94 crores which is more than the user fee collections at entry points. The contribution value of biodiversity and other ecosystem services for the entire Melghat landscape was IRs 2156 crore. Timber and carbon sequestration loss due to land distributed under forest rights was IRs 447.23 crore, while gains from agricultural use of that land by farmers was merely IRs 7.07 crore. Thus, the land conversion resulted in 63 times higher loss in the total ecosystem services than the gains from the subsistence-level farming practice for provisioning service alone. The total economic value of the Melghat landscape was estimated at IRs 1,69,853 crore, equalling to IRs 57.20 lakh per ha. The Net Present Value (NPV) of IRs 7.5 lakh per ha for protected areas such as the MTR prescribed by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India is much lower than the estimated value, emphasizing the need to revise NPV using appropriate valuation methodology.
References
Anonymous.1999. India Sate of Forest Report 1999. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Dehra Dun, India.
Anonymous. 2006. GL, 4(4), Table 4.3. Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change,http://www.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-nggip.iges.or.jp /public/2006gl/pdf/4_Volume4/V4_04_Ch4_Forest_Land.pdf
Anonymous. 2011. Annual Report and Accounts 2011-2012. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, Great Britain/England.
Anonymous. 2019. Forest (Conservation) Act, Guidelines. Forest conservation division. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi, India.
Carrasco, L.R., Nghiem, T.P.L., Sunderland, T. and Koh, L.P. 2014. Economic valuation of ecosystem services fails to capture biodiversity value of tropical forests. Biological Conservation, 178, 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.007
Chan, S.J. 2014. Forest valuation under the generalized Faustmann formula. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44, 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2013-0298
Czajkowski, M., Giergiczny, M., Kronenberg, J. and Englin, J. 2019. The individual travel cost method with consumerspecific values of travel time savings. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74, 961-984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019- 00355-6
Goslee, K., Walker, S.M., Grais, A., Murray, L., Casarim, F. and Brown, S. 2012. Leaf technical guidance series for development of forests carbon monitoring system for REDD+ : module C-CS calculations for estimating carbon stocks. USAID ASIA.
Karanth, U., James, N.D., Kumar, N.S., William, A.L. and Hines, J.E. 2004. Tigers and their prey: Predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(14), 4854-4858.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306210101
Krishnaswamy, J., Bonell, M., Venkatesh, B., Purandara, B.K., Rakesh, K.N., Lele, S., Kiran, M.C., Reddy, V. and Badiger, S. 2013.The groundwater rechargeresponse andhydrologic services of tropical humid forest ecosystems to use and reforestation: support for the infiltration-evapotranspiration trade-off hypothesis. Journal of Hydrology, 498, 191-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.06.034
Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D. and Bennett, G. 2011. Update: State of Biodiversity Markets. Washington, DC: Forest Trends, 2011. Available at: http://www.Ecosystem Market Place.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm
Masiero, M., Pettenella, D., Boscolo, M., Barua, S.K, Animon, I. and Matta, J.R. 2019. Valuing forest ecosystem services: a training manual for planners and project developers.Forestry Working Paper No. 11. Rome, FAO. 216 pages.
Mullan, K. 2014. The Value of Forest Ecosystem Services to Developing Economies. Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 379. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2622748 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.262274.
Mullan, K. and Kontoleon, A. 2008. Benefits and Costs of Forest Biodiversity: EconomicTheory and Case Study Evidence, Monograph Report. Published for the European Commission as part of the Potsdam Initiative and TEEB, 167 pages. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/pdf/scoping.Pdf
Ninan, K.N. and Kontolean, A. 2016. Valuing forest ecosystem services anddisservices – Case study of a protected area in India (Nagarhole NP). EcosystemServices, 20, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.05.001
Shaikh, S., Choudhary, V. and Singh, L. 2019a. Forest & ecosystem valuation: A case study of Melghat landscape. Journal of Plant Development Research, 11(10), 625-628.
Shaikh, S. Choudhary, V. and Singh, L. 2019b. Comparative study of growing stock of Melghat forests under different silvicultural prescriptions. Tropical Plant Research, 6(3), 521-523. https://doi.org/1022271/tpr.2019.v6.i3.065
Shaikh, S., Singh, L. and Taide, Y. 2019c. Impact of forest rights on value of Melghat landscape. Journal of Plant Development Research, 11(1), 685-687.
Sharma, J.V., Gokhale, Y., Chauhan, S. and Tyagi, A. 2015. Forest right act and climate change vulnerability: Impact on forests and forest dwelling communities in Maharashtra. Indian Forester, 141(12), 1230-1236.
Singh, L., Anurag, Shaikh, S. and Mali, H. 2020. Quantification of direct and indirect recreation benefits of Melghat Forests. RASSA Journal of Science Society, 2(1), 46-49.
Tewari, V.P. 2017. Enhancing carbon retention through improved forest management. Indian Forester, 143 (9), 928-930.
Verma, M. and Kumar, V. 2006. Natural resource accounting of land and forestry sector for the sates of Madhya Pradesh & Himachal Pradesh. IIFM CSO Report, 195-198 & 223-227.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lalji Singh, Saipun I Sheikh, ShaliniToppo, J. S. Singh, Ekta Singh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
