Willingness To Pay (WTP) for Community-Based-Conservation Activities: A Comparative Study of Harike, Ropar and Nangal Wetlands in Punjab, India

Authors

  • Gaurav Kumar Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
  • Amandeep Kaur Department of Geography, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda
  • Jajati Keshari Parida Department of Economic Studies, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Telengana, India
  • Arti Singh Department of Geography, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India
  • Kiran Kumari Singh Department of Geography, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0195

Keywords:

Wetlands, Perceived benefits, Livelihood, Willingness to Pay (WTP), Community based conservation, Punjab, Avifaunal community

Abstract

Conservation of wetlands is essential because they provide numerous benefits to mankind in supporting human life, ecosystems and biodiversity, but predominant number of wetlands are at risk of degradation and loss due to both anthropogenic and natural processes. In this context, community participation is very important in the process of conservation of wetlands. Based on a primary survey of communities (401 households) living around three important wetlands of international importance (Harike, Ropar and Conservation of wetlands is essential because they provide numerous benefits to mankind in supporting human life, ecosystems and biodiversity, but predominant number of wetlands are at risk of degradation and loss due to both anthropogenic and natural processes. In this context, community participation is very important in the process of conservation of wetlands. Based on a primary survey of communities (401 households) living around three important wetlands of international importance (Harike, Ropar and Nangal Wetlands of Punjab), we examined the factors that determine individuals’ willingness to pay for the protection of these wetlands. Using both qualitative (Likert scale) and quantitative (Probit regression) tools, we observed that these wetlands not only provide livelihood mechanisms to local people (living in villages and surrounding urban centers), but they also provide recreational opportunities. The respondents are aware about the ecological significance of the wetland and are willing to pay an average amount of INR 30 (US$0.5) per month. The standard of living, individual’s level of education and awareness, and occupation significantly determine their willingness to pay for wetland protection in Punjab. Results of this study advocate the conservation of these wetlands from the perspective of sustaining the livelihoods of local people and provision of ecosystem services (ES) in Punjab, India.

References

Ambastha, K. Hussain, S.A. and Badola, R. 2007. Social and economic considerations in conserving wetlands of indo-gangetic plains: A case study of Kabartal wetland, India. Environmentalist, 27, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-007-9003-1

Anonymous. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment World Resources Institute, Washington DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf

Anonymous. 2007. Conservation of Wetlands in India: A Profile (Approach and guidelines). Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF), Government of India, New Delhi. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/wetlands.pdf

Anonymous. 2011a. National Wetland Atlas: Punjab. Space Apllication Centre, Ahmedabad, India. https://vedas.sac.gov.in/vcms/en/National_Wetland_Inventory_and_Assessment_(NWIA)_Atlas.html

Anonymous. 2011b. National wetland atlas: Punjab. Space Applications Centre, Indian Space Resreach Organisation, Ahmedabad, India. https://vedas.sac.gov.in/en/National_Wetland_Inventory_and_Assessment_(NWIA)_Atlas.html

Anonymous. 2012. Destination wetlands: supporting sustainable tourism. Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Gland, Switzerland; Madrid, Spain:. https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/ramsar_unwto_tourism_e_sept2012.pdf

Anonymous. 2018. Scaling up wetland conservation, wise use and restoration to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands and World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), Gland, Switzerland https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/wetlands_sdgs_e_0.pdf

Anonymous. 2021. Ramsar Wetlands Sites. ENVIS center on Wildlife, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. http://www.wiienvis.nic.in/Database/ramsar_wetland_sites_8224.aspx

Bassi, N., Kumar, M.D., Sharma, A. and Pardha-Saradhi, P. 2014. Status of wetlands in India: A review of extent, ecosystem benefits, threats and management strategies. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2(11), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.07.001

Birol, E. and Cox, V. 2007. Using chioce experiments to design wetland management programs: the case of Severn Estuary Wetland, UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(3), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701261661

Chopra, R., Verma, V.K. and Sharma, P.K. 2001. Mapping, monitoring and conservation of Harike wetland ecosystem, Punjab, India, through remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311601750038866

Dahl, T.E. and Allord, G.J. 1997. Techincal aspects of wetlands: History of wetlands in the conterminous United States. National Water Summary-wetladn resoures: techinal aspectes. US Geological Survey. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/documents/History-of-Wetlands-in-the-Conterminous-United-States.pdf

Davidson, N.C., Van Dam, A.A., Finlayson, C.M. and McInnes, R.J. 2019. Worth of wetlands: Revised global monetary values of coastal and inland wetland ecosystem services. Marine and Freshwater Research, 70, 1189-1194. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18391

Dougherty, C. 2011. Introduction to Econometrics. 4th edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ghermandi, A., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Brander, L.M. and Nunes, P.A.L.D. 2008. The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: A meta analysis. FEEM working paper No. 79.2008. Gondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/53239/1/644266198.pdf

Ghosh, P.K. and Mondal, M.S. 2013. Economic valuation of the non-use attributes of a south-western coastal wetland in Bangladesh. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(9), 1403-1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.724667

Gopal, B. and Ghosh, D. 2008. Natural wetlands. Pp. 2493-2304. In: Encyclopedia of Ecology, Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Academic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00067-7

Kakuru, W., Turyahabwe, N. and Mugisha, J. 2013. Total economic value of wetlands products and services in Uganda. The Scientific World Journal, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/192656

Keddy, P.A. Fraser, L.H., Solomeshch, A.I., Junk, W.J., Campbell, D.R., Arroyo, M.T.K. and Alho, C.J.R. 2009. Wet and wonderful: The world’s largest wetlands are conservation priorities. BioScience, 59(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.88

Kumar, G. and Singh, K.K. 2020. Mapping and monitoring the selected wetlands of Punjab, India, using geospatial techniques. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 48, 615-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01104-99

Kundu, N., Pal, M. and Saha, S. 2008. East Kollata wetlands: A resource recovery system through productive activities. pp. 868-881. In: Proceedings of Taal2007: The 12th World Lake Conference, Jaipur. International Lake Environment Committee Foundation, Japan. https://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TEEB-India-Wetlands-Synthesis.pdf

Ladhar, S.S. 2002. Status of ecological health of wetlands in Punjab, India. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 5(4), 457-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634980290002002

Lagbas, A.J. 2018. Social valuation of regulating and cultural ecosytem services of Arroceros Forest Park: A man-made forest in the city of Manila, Philippines. Journal of Urban Management, 8(1), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.09.002

McNeely, J.A. 1989. Protected areas and human ecology: how national parks can contribute to sustaining societies of the twenty-first century. pp. 150-157. In: Western, D. and Pearl, M.C. (Eds.). Conservation for the Twenty-first Century. Oxford University Press, New York.

Moore, P.D. 2006. Biomes of the Earth:Wetlands. Chelsea House Publishers, Hong Kong. 241 pages

Nonga, H.E., Mdegela, R.H., Lie, E., Sandvik, M. and Skaare, J.U. 2010. Socio-economic values of wetland resources around lake Manyara Tanzania: Assessment of enviormental threats and local community awareness on environmental degratdation and their effects. Journal of Wetlands Ecology, 4, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.3126/jowe.v4i0.4153

Prasad, S.N., Ramachandra, T.V., Ahalya, N., Sengupta, T., Kumar, A., Tiwari, A.K. and Vijayan, L. 2002. Conservation of wetlands of India-A review. Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 173-186. https://wgbis.ces.iisc.ac.in/energy/water/paper/conservation_wetlands/index.htm

Ravenga, C., Brunner, J., Henninger, N., Kassem, K. and Payne, R. 2000. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: Freshwater systems. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/research/pilot-analysis-global-ecosystems-freshwater-systems

Stevens, T.H., Benin, S. and Larson, J.S. 1995. Public attitudes and economics values for wetland preservation in New England. Wetlands, 15, 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160702

Vijayan, A., Job, E. and Thomas, A. 2015. Willingness to pay to conserve wetland ecosystems: A case study of Vellayani Fresh Water Lake in South India. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5(4), 1-5. https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/recent_issues_pdf/2015/April/April_2015_1427893944__01.pdf

Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. and Melillo, J.M. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494-499. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494

Yang, W., Chang, J., Xu, B., Peng, C. and Ge, Y. 2008. Ecosystem service value assessment for constructed wetlands: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Ecological Economics, 68, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.008

Yu, J. and Belcher, K. 2011. An economic analysis of landowners’ willingness to adopt wetland and riparian conservation management. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(2), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2011.01219.x

Zedler, J.B. and Kercher, S. 2005. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 39-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144248

Zhang, C., Robinson, D., Wang, J., Liu, J., Liu, X., Tong, L. 2011. Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to particpate in the conservation of cultivated land to wetland program in Sanjiang National Nature Reserve, China. Environmental Management, 47, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9586-z

Zhu, H., Guan, Z., Wei, X. 2016. Factors influencing farmers’willingness to participate in wetland restoration: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 8(12), 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121325

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Kumar, G., Kaur, A., Parida, J. K., Singh, A., & Singh, K. K. (2024). Willingness To Pay (WTP) for Community-Based-Conservation Activities: A Comparative Study of Harike, Ropar and Nangal Wetlands in Punjab, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 50(5), 727–737. https://doi.org/10.55863/ijees.2024.0195